← Back to Predictions

Thijmen Loof vs Jesse Delaney — Prediction

Challenger Hard Guangzhou 2 challenger · qualification - round of 16 11:30

Predicted probability

Thijmen Loof

Netherlands

66.86%

Jesse Delaney

Australia

33.14%

Average Odds

1.37  /  2.89

Market probability

67.84%  /  32.16%

Why This Prediction?

Thijmen Loof is the favorite because he has a higher Elo rating (1401 vs 1228), a higher Elo rating on hard courts (1442 vs 1233) and more aces per game (0.33 vs 0.25).

Player Comparison

1401.4 Elo 1228.1
1442.4 Elo (surface) 1233.1
5 Wins (Challenger) 7
4 Wins (surface) 6
5 Last 15 form 2
0 Head-to-head wins 0
0.983 Dominance ratio 1.165
1522 Rank 1245
24.2 Age 27.8
right Hand right

Performance vs. the Odds

Career record grouped by how big a favorite the market made each player, based on their average odds.

Thijmen Loof

Heavy favorite (odds below 1.30) 0W–0L · 0.0%
Favorite (odds 1.30-1.80) 0W–1L · 0.0%
Even match (odds 1.80-2.20) 1W–0L · 100.0%
Underdog (odds 2.20-4.00) 1W–1L · 50.0%
Heavy underdog (odds above 4.00) 0W–1L · 0.0%

5 matches with market odds since 2026-06-06.

Jesse Delaney

Heavy favorite (odds below 1.30) 0W–0L · 0.0%
Favorite (odds 1.30-1.80) 1W–0L · 100.0%
Even match (odds 1.80-2.20) 0W–0L · 0.0%
Underdog (odds 2.20-4.00) 1W–2L · 33.3%
Heavy underdog (odds above 4.00) 1W–6L · 14.3%

11 matches with market odds since 2026-06-28.

Serve & Return

Serve and return win rates from each player's last 10 matches at the selected level.

Thijmen Loof Jesse Delaney

1st Serve In %

61.9%

1st Serve Points Won %

66.3%

2nd Serve Points Won %

40.6%

Return Points Won vs 1st Serve %

28.8%

Return Points Won vs 2nd Serve %

50.0%

Aces per Service Game

0.26

Double Faults per Service Game

0.26

Based on each player's last 10 ATP/Grand Slam matches.

1st Serve In %

59.3%
68.9%

1st Serve Points Won %

74.0%
67.4%

2nd Serve Points Won %

54.7%
48.5%

Return Points Won vs 1st Serve %

33.3%
37.6%

Return Points Won vs 2nd Serve %

42.5%
59.2%

Aces per Service Game

0.65
0.63

Double Faults per Service Game

0.19
0.18

Based on each player's last 10 Challenger matches.

Break Point Performance

How each player handles the biggest points - break points saved serving, and converted returning - from their last 10 matches at the selected level.

Thijmen Loof Jesse Delaney

Break Points Saved %

57.9%

Break Points Converted %

71.4%

Based on each player's last 10 ATP/Grand Slam matches.

Break Points Saved %

63.3%
55.0%

Break Points Converted %

45.3%
41.9%

Based on each player's last 10 Challenger matches.

Head-to-Head

Thijmen Loof 00 Jesse Delaney

Hard Guangzhou 2 challenger · 2026-09-14

qualification - round of 16

Jesse Delaney #1280

Thijmen Loof #1381

6-4 6-3
11 Aces 4
4 Double Faults 3
- Service Points -
- First Serve In -
26 First Serve Won 31
10 Second Serve Won 9
3 Break Points Saved 3
7 Break Points Faced 4
- Winners -
- Unforced Errors -
2.9 Average Odds 1.4

Thijmen Loof — Last 10

L W L W L L W L W L

Jesse Delaney — Last 10

L W W L L L L L L W