ATP tennis predict — Jerome Kym vs Philip Henning

Challenger Clay Zug challenger · R16

Predicted probability

Jerome Kym

Switzerland

87.21%

Philip Henning

RSA

12.79%

Average Odds

1.18 / 4.51

Market probability

79.26% / 20.74%

Why This Prediction?

Jerome Kym is the favorite because he has a higher Elo rating on clay courts (1747 vs 1424), a higher Elo rating (1747 vs 1634) and a stronger serve (65.8% vs 55.9% of service points won).

Player Comparison

1747.4 Elo 1633.6

1746.8 Elo (surface) 1423.9

77 Wins (Challenger) 26

58 Wins (surface) 2

10 Last 15 form 9

0 Head-to-head wins 0

1.050 Dominance ratio 0.806

198 Rank 294

23.4 Age 25.7

right Hand right

Performance vs. the Odds

Career record grouped by how big a favorite the market made each player, based on their average odds.

Jerome Kym

Heavy favorite (odds below 1.30) 4W–1L · 80.0%

Favorite (odds 1.30-1.80) 7W–4L · 63.6%

Even match (odds 1.80-2.20) 1W–1L · 50.0%

Underdog (odds 2.20-4.00) 0W–2L · 0.0%

Heavy underdog (odds above 4.00) 0W–0L · 0.0%

20 matches with market odds since 2026-05-26.

Philip Henning

Heavy favorite (odds below 1.30) 4W–0L · 100.0%

Favorite (odds 1.30-1.80) 3W–3L · 50.0%

Even match (odds 1.80-2.20) 1W–0L · 100.0%

Underdog (odds 2.20-4.00) 1W–5L · 16.7%

Heavy underdog (odds above 4.00) 1W–0L · 100.0%

18 matches with market odds since 2026-05-26.

Serve & Return

Serve and return win rates from each player's last 10 matches at the selected level.

Jerome Kym Philip Henning

1st Serve In %

62.0%

67.8%

1st Serve Points Won %

78.6%

65.4%

2nd Serve Points Won %

50.0%

52.4%

Return Points Won vs 1st Serve %

27.7%

31.1%

Return Points Won vs 2nd Serve %

50.5%

53.2%

Aces per Service Game

0.97

0.26

Double Faults per Service Game

0.34

0.12

Based on each player's last 10 ATP/Grand Slam matches.

1st Serve In %

58.4%

59.6%

1st Serve Points Won %

72.7%

65.8%

2nd Serve Points Won %

48.9%

48.6%

Return Points Won vs 1st Serve %

26.4%

33.9%

Return Points Won vs 2nd Serve %

45.4%

52.0%

Aces per Service Game

0.53

0.51

Double Faults per Service Game

0.20

0.29

Based on each player's last 10 Challenger matches.

Break Point Performance

How each player handles the biggest points - break points saved serving, and converted returning - from their last 10 matches at the selected level.

Jerome Kym Philip Henning

Break Points Saved %

71.4%

57.1%

Break Points Converted %

32.9%

38.9%

Based on each player's last 10 ATP/Grand Slam matches.

Break Points Saved %

48.9%

63.4%

Break Points Converted %

33.9%

34.6%

Based on each player's last 10 Challenger matches.

Head-to-Head

Jerome Kym 0 – 0 Philip Henning

Clay Zug challenger · 2026-07-22

R16

Philip Henning #294

Jerome Kym #198

7-5 4-6 6-0

8 Aces 11

5 Double Faults 2

82 Service Points 99

36 First Serve In 70

28 First Serve Won 47

22 Second Serve Won 17

4 Break Points Saved 7

8 Break Points Faced 8

- Winners -

- Unforced Errors -

4.5 Average Odds 1.2

Jerome Kym vs Philip Henning — Prediction